started · updated
AI-generated food menus face consumer backlash
The increasing use of generative AI to create restaurant menus and food advertisements is drawing significant consumer backlash. Users have reported encountering images that appear ‘too perfect,’ ‘rubbery,’ or ‘uncanny,’ leading to a phenomenon some have dubbed the ‘AI flyer epidemic.’
Experts suggest the issue stems from the way diffusion models and large language models are trained. Alex Lisle, CTO of Reality Defender, notes that these models often rely on a narrow, hyper-symmetrical aesthetic that can result in ‘Lovecraftian food horrors’—images that look almost real but feel fundamentally wrong. This aesthetic often mimics older, standardized commercial photography, creating a sense of repetitive sameness.
Psychologists, including Alexander Diel from the University of Duisburg-Essen, highlight that humans are naturally sensitive to visual cues in food due to the biological necessity of identifying safe, edible items. When AI-generated images appear slightly ‘off,’ it can trigger a sense of distrust or even physical aversion. This has led some consumers to view AI-generated marketing as a sign of low quality or ‘false advertising,’ with some opting to patronize businesses that use traditional photography instead.
Entities
Adaeze Onejeme · Alex Lisle · CNN · Hollywood · Reality Defender · TikTok · University of Duisburg-Essen
Claims
What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.
- [● 3 SOURCES] Psychologists suggest humans are sensitive to visual irregularities in food imagery due to biological safety instincts. kioncentralcoast.com · krdo.com · kvia.com
- [● 3 SOURCES] AI-generated food images in Hollywood night markets appear too perfect or rubbery compared to real food. kioncentralcoast.com · krdo.com · kvia.com
- [● 3 SOURCES] The use of AI-generated images for food menus raises questions regarding false advertising. kioncentralcoast.com · krdo.com · kvia.com