Finland Human Dignity Barometer reveals social gaps and political polarization

The first Human Dignity Barometer, published by Diakonissalaitos, reveals a perceived deficiency in the realization of human dignity in Finland. Survey respondents indicated that current conditions fall significantly short of target levels across four key metrics: equal treatment, respectful treatment of vulnerable groups, the adequacy of social safety nets, and the ability of marginalized individuals to have their voices heard.

On a scale of 1 to 7, the current state of respectful treatment for those in vulnerable positions was rated at 3.52, compared to a target of 6.00. The ability of marginalized people to be heard received the lowest score of 2.75 against a target of 5.32. There is a broad consensus that the state bears significant responsibility for the well-being of disadvantaged groups, though views on the extent of this responsibility vary.

The data also highlights deep political polarization regarding human rights and social security. Analysis by Professor Juho Saari of Tampere University shows that political leanings influence perceptions of dignity; supporters of the Left Alliance are generally more dissatisfied with the current state of human dignity, while supporters of the National Coalition Party report the highest levels of satisfaction. Conversely, supporters of the Finns Party expressed significantly lower belief in equal human dignity regardless of background or life situation.