Flock Safety AI cameras raise privacy and legal concerns in the US and Canada

More than 100,000 AI‑powered Flock Safety cameras have been installed on streets across the United States, with plans to expand into Canada. The devices record vehicle license plates, routes and other movements, and law‑enforcement agencies—including the FBI, ICE, ATF and CBP—can query the database without local approval. Critics say the system has led to wrongful accusations and a chilling effect on privacy, prompting protests, camera removal efforts and calls for tighter oversight.

At the same time, homeowners are grappling with the legality of private security cameras. Experts stress that video can be recorded in public‑facing rooms, but placing cameras in bedrooms, bathrooms or other private spaces generally violates expectations of privacy. Audio recording is governed by state consent laws: one‑party consent states (e.g., Colorado, Texas) allow recording if at least one participant agrees, while two‑party consent states (e.g., California, Florida) require all parties’ permission. Users are advised to review local statutes and disable cameras in private areas to avoid civil or criminal liability.