Kosovo weighs US gas options amid political debate over LNG and coal‑gasification

Kosovo’s government is assessing two US‑backed options to diversify its energy supply: a liquefied natural gas (LNG) interconnection with North Macedonia and a coal‑gasification project. Acting President Albulena Haxhiu said the decision cannot be reduced to a simple “yes” or “no” and must be evaluated by the responsible institutions and experts. Economy Minister Artane Rizvanolli highlighted the need for a thorough cost‑benefit analysis, while Prime Minister Albin Kurti has so far declined to commit, citing insufficient information on expenses.

The US Embassy in Pristina announced that Washington is ready to work with Kosovo on LNG projects and broader energy diversification. Energy expert Laura Kryeziu described the LNG link—approximately 86 km of pipeline to a Greek terminal via North Macedonia—as the most realistic option, estimating a capital cost of about €100 million. By contrast, the coal‑gasification route is viewed as water‑intensive, expensive and environmentally damaging, with critics pointing to high greenhouse‑gas emissions.

Environmental NGO Bankwatch warned that both alternatives are financially unrealistic in the short term and conflict with EU climate‑neutrality targets. The Kosovo Business Association echoed calls for LNG participation, arguing that reliable, affordable gas is essential for industry competitiveness and to curb rising energy bills, which the opposition party PDK frames as a national‑security issue.

The debate reflects broader political tensions: PDK’s Vlora Çitaku portrays the gas project as a strategic security matter, while the ruling party stresses fiscal prudence. The outcome will shape Kosovo’s energy security, public‑budget pressures and its alignment with Western partners.