< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · Canada · 48 sources

started · updated

Mike Hicks faces criticism over First Nations 'conquered' comment

Mike Hicks, the Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat in British Columbia, is facing intense criticism following comments made during an October 9 debate. Hicks stated that First Nations must be “conquered,” a remark that was widely circulated on social media.

Hicks has defended his words, claiming they were taken out of context. He explained that he was inartfully describing historical legal frameworks, noting that under English law, territories were historically acquired either through war or treaty. He emphasized that British Columbia settled without doing either and stated, “And I’m all for it, of course,” in reference to negotiating treaties.

However, critics have condemned the language. T’Sou-ke Councillor Debra Lazzar called the comments “profoundly offensive and deeply concerning,” arguing that framing Indigenous rights as a barrier to economic growth erases historical harm. NDP candidate Dana Lajeunesse also condemned the choice of words, stating that the term “conquered” carries a painful history. Green Party Leader Emily Lowan has called for the Conservative Party to remove Hicks from their candidate slate.

Entities

Conservative Party · Conservative Party of British Columbia · Dana Lajeunesse · Emily Lowan · Juan de Fuca-Malahat · Mike Hicks · T’Sou-ke Nation

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Sources