< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · United States · 14 sources

started · updated

Ninth Circuit blocks California law requiring federal agents to show ID

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a unanimous ruling blocking California’s “No Vigilantes Act,” which sought to require non-uniformed federal immigration agents to display identification during operations. The court determined that the state law violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, asserting that states cannot directly regulate the performance of federal governmental functions without congressional authorization.

In a separate legal development, California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed the state’s 100th lawsuit against the federal government since 2025. This specific challenge targets U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for conducting civil immigration enforcement actions at or near state courthouses. Bonta argues that these arrests create a “chilling effect” that deters witnesses and victims from participating in the judicial process, thereby undermining public safety and state sovereignty.

Data cited in the litigation indicates a significant increase in ICE arrests at courthouses, with the state reporting that monthly arrests spiked by more than 550% following policy changes in mid-2025. While California officials maintain these actions are unconstitutional, the White House has defended the legality of the enforcement practices.

Entities

California · Donald Trump · Gavin Newsom · Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Mark J. Bennett · Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · Rob Bonta · U.S. Department of Justice · U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Sources