Serbian Parliament debates judicial reforms amid criticism of authoritarian rule

Lawmakers in the National Assembly of Serbia continued an emergency sitting with a 32‑item agenda, focusing on amendments to the set of judicial laws that have been revised to incorporate the Venice Commission’s recommendations. The proposals, presented by Justice Minister Nenad Vujić and Health Minister Zlatibor Lončar, include changes to the Public Prosecutor’s Office law, the Judges’ Law, the High Prosecutorial Council law, and statutes governing courts and high‑tech crime. The Venice Commission praised Serbia for adopting seven of nine key suggestions in its rapid response to the Commission’s April opinion.

Opposition deputies argued the reforms were driven by EU pressure and criticised the government’s approach, while political commentators warned that Serbia is sliding into authoritarianism. They cited recent Constitutional Court rulings that run counter to the authorities’ interests and expressed doubt that upcoming elections will be free and fair, suggesting the regime may manipulate outcomes to retain power.