Serbia's contested judicial reforms receive Venice Commission endorsement amid domestic criticism

Serbian opposition leaders say the government's recent amendments to the so‑called “Mrdić laws” are a superficial attempt to mask the regime's continued control over the judiciary. They argue that, despite the European Union withholding growth‑plan funds, the changes were made only after pressure from the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe.

The Venice Commission has reportedly issued an “absolute positive opinion” on the proposed amendments, a claim the ruling party cites as validation. However, the Syndicate of Judicial Workers warns that three of the most damaging provisions—relating to the appointment of the High Public Prosecutor, the exclusion of two senior prosecutors from the Organized Crime Prosecutor’s Office, and limits on cooperation with international crime‑fighting bodies—remain unchanged.

Opposition figure Stefan Janjić warned that the regime continues to protect criminal networks close to power and that any further legal mimicry will not bring Serbia into compliance with EU standards. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between Serbia’s aspirations for EU accession and concerns over judicial independence.