started · updated
Seventh Circuit rules AI-generated child pornography is legal to possess
A federal appeals court has ruled that the private possession of AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is protected by the First Amendment, provided no real children were used in the creation of the images. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reached this decision by adhering to the 2002 Supreme Court precedent, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, which struck down restrictions on sexually explicit depictions of fictional children when no actual minors were exploited.
The ruling upheld the dismissal of possession charges against Wisconsin resident Steven Anderegg, who was found with hundreds of AI-generated sexually explicit images of children on his devices. While the court dismissed the possession charges, Anderegg still faces other charges related to the alleged production, distribution, and transfer of such material to a minor.
In the ruling, Judge John Lee expressed significant concern regarding the impact of modern technology on existing legal frameworks. He noted that while the court is bound by precedent, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence allows for the creation of hyper-realistic images that are virtually indistinguishable from real child abuse material, a capability that was likely unimaginable when the Supreme Court set its 2002 precedent.
Entities
Department of Justice · John Lee · Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · Steven Anderegg · Supreme Court of the United States
Claims
What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.
- [● 4 SOURCES] Judge John Lee expressed concern that modern AI can generate images virtually indistinguishable from material depicting the abuse of real children. www.zerohedge.com · nemosnewsnetwork.com · www.stationgossip.com · zeny.iprima.cz
- [● 4 SOURCES] The ruling relies on the 2002 Supreme Court precedent Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition. www.zerohedge.com · nemosnewsnetwork.com · www.stationgossip.com · zeny.iprima.cz
- [○ 1 SOURCE] The court upheld the dismissal of possession charges against Wisconsin resident Steven Anderegg, who was found with hundreds of AI-generated sexually explicit images of children. www.stationgossip.com
- [● 4 SOURCES] The Seventh Circuit ruled that the private possession of AI-generated child pornography is protected by the First Amendment if no real child was involved in creating the images. www.zerohedge.com · nemosnewsnetwork.com · www.stationgossip.com · zeny.iprima.cz