< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · Sierra Leone · 5 sources

started · updated

Sierra Leone Police disallow Citizens Advocacy Network protest

The Sierra Leone Police have disallowed a planned protest and procession scheduled for August 26, 2026, in Freetown. The demonstration, organized by the Citizens Advocacy Network (CAN) under Executive Director Thomas Moore Conteh, was intended to raise concerns regarding the controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill.

The police stated the prohibition was issued under Section 17(2) of the Public Order Act No. 46 of 1965, citing the group's failure to attend a scheduled interview on August 19. The police maintained that the decision was necessary to protect public order and safety.

In response, the Citizens Advocacy Network has refuted the police's account, labeling their communications as “untrue and misleading.” CAN asserts they were never formally invited to any meeting or engagement regarding the protest. The organization dismissed claims of consultation, stating that a telephone call from an unidentified individual does not constitute a formal invitation on a matter of national importance.

Entities

Citizens Advocacy Network · Freetown · Sierra Leone Police · Thomas Moore Conteh

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

  • [○ 1 SOURCE] The planned protest was intended to address concerns regarding the Constitutional Amendment Bill. voiceofsalonenewspaper.com
  • [● 2 SOURCES] The Sierra Leone Police disallowed a planned protest by the Citizens Advocacy Network because the group did not attend a scheduled interview on August 19, 2026. voiceofsalonenewspaper.com · sierraloaded.sl
  • [● 2 SOURCES] The police cited Section 17(2) of the Public Order Act No. 46 of 1965 as the legal basis for prohibiting the procession. voiceofsalonenewspaper.com · sierraloaded.sl
  • [● 2 SOURCES] The Citizens Advocacy Network denies receiving a formal invitation to meet with the police regarding the planned protest. libertyonlinetv.com · truthmedia.sl
  • [● 2 SOURCES] The organization claims a telephone call from an unidentified individual does not constitute a formal invitation for consultation. libertyonlinetv.com · truthmedia.sl