< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · United States · 3 sources

started · updated

Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to bar student IDs for voting

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted an emergency request from New Hampshire, allowing the state to enforce a law that excludes student identification cards as valid photo ID for voting. The unsigned order, issued on October 22, pauses lower court injunctions that had previously limited the enforcement of the state’s identification guidance.

The law, House Bill 323, was signed by Governor Kelly Ayotte in April and took effect in June. It removed high school, college, and university ID cards from the list of documents expressly accepted to obtain a ballot. The dispute centered on whether election officials could use student IDs as supporting evidence under a state provision that allows voters to establish identity through alternative means.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante had previously blocked a directive from Secretary of State David Scanlan that prevented officials from considering student IDs as identity evidence. The Supreme Court’s decision to stay these injunctions follows the Purcell principle, which suggests federal courts should avoid altering election rules close to an election. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the sole dissenter, arguing the lower court's order was a targeted measure to address misinformation rather than a change to the law.

Entities

Coalition for Open Democracy · David Scanlan · Kelly Ayotte · New Hampshire · Supreme Court of the United States

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Sources