Sweden faces potential loss of political trust during government formation

An extended period of government formation in Sweden poses a risk to public trust in the political system, according to political scientist Jan Teorell of Stockholm University. While prolonged negotiations do not necessarily trigger acute economic or security crises—citing precedents in Sweden in 2018 and Belgium in 2010–2011—the primary concern is the potential for lasting damage to voter confidence if negotiations fail and lead to an extraordinary election.

During this interim period, Sweden is led by a caretaker government. While this administration possesses the same powers as a regular government, it lacks a parliamentary majority to implement major policy shifts, such as the Tidö Agreement policies. To manage urgent matters, the Riksdag can utilize committee initiatives, and if a new government is not established by the November budget deadline, a prolongation budget will be implemented.