< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · United States · 21 sources

started · updated

Ninth Circuit Blocks Trump Mandatory Immigration Detention Policy

On Thursday the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2‑1 decision that the Trump administration’s expansion of mandatory detention for immigrants held inside the United States violates immigration law. The majority opinion was written by Judge Daniel Bress, a Trump‑appointed judge, who concluded that the 1996 Immigration and Nationality Act does not authorize the policy and that it departs from three decades of precedent.

The ruling joins at least four other federal appellate courts that have rejected the administration’s “no‑bond” rule, while the Fifth and Eighth Circuits have upheld it. The decision stems from a class‑action suit filed by agricultural worker Ramón Rodríguez Vásquez and other detained immigrants. The court noted that the administration’s guidance, issued in July 2024, expands mandatory detention to people arrested in the interior of the country. The Department of Homeland Security issued a statement disagreeing with the Ninth Circuit panel. The split among the circuits increases the likelihood that the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the issue in its next term.

Entities

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals · Daniel Bress · Donald Trump · Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · Ramón Rodríguez Vásquez · Trump administration · U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how well corroborated each claim is across sources.

Sources