< Back to all clusters
[INTERNATIONAL] · United States · 22 sources

started · updated

US Appeals Court blocks Trump administration third-country deportation policy

A three-judge panel of the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a ruling that the Department of Homeland Security’s third-country removal policy is unlawful. The decision, authored by Judge Seth Aframe, mandates that migrants facing deportation to countries with which they have no ties must be provided with meaningful advance notice and a genuine opportunity to raise safety concerns regarding potential persecution or torture.

The court rejected the Trump administration’s argument that diplomatic assurances from receiving nations were sufficient to bypass individualized notice requirements. The policy, adopted in March 2025, allowed for rapid removals with minimal notice if receiving countries provided blanket assurances against mistreatment. The ruling affirms that due process protections enacted by Congress cannot be circumvented through such procedures.

The Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision to the US Supreme Court. Under current administration policies, the US has reached agreements to send more than 25,000 migrants to at least 29 third countries, frequently including Mexico.

Entities

1st US Circuit Court of Appeals · Department of Homeland Security · Donald Trump · First US Circuit Court of Appeals · National Immigration Litigation Alliance · Seth Aframe · U.S. Court of Appeals

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Sources

about 9 hours ago
about 9 hours ago
about 11 hours ago