< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · United States · 18 sources

started · updated

US states sue federal agencies over Endangered Species Act rollbacks

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia have filed two lawsuits against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The legal action challenges recent federal rules that roll back protections under the Endangered Species Act.

The first lawsuit targets the rescission of the regulatory definition of 'harm.' Previously, this definition included significant habitat modification or degradation. The new rule narrows 'harm' to actions that directly injure or kill animals, which critics argue opens sensitive habitats to mining, logging, and oil drilling.

The second lawsuit challenges rules that eliminate broad protections for newly threatened species and establishes a new process for designating critical habitats. This new process requires the government to consider objections from developers and fossil fuel companies before designating protected areas.

Former leaders of federal wildlife agencies have also urged the administration to withdraw these rollbacks, warning that excluding habitat destruction from the definition of harm undermines the ability to prevent species extinction.

Entities

Donald Trump · Endangered Species Act · Letitia James · National Marine Fisheries Service · Nick Brown · Rob Bonta · U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Sources

Friends of Animals [friendsofanimals.org]
11 days ago