started · updated
Voynich Manuscript may have been incorrectly bound
New research suggests that the Voynich Manuscript, a medieval codex famous for its indecipherable text and mysterious illustrations, may have been bound in the wrong order. This error could fundamentally change how scholars interpret the document's botanical, astronomical, and biological content.
In a study published in the journal Digital Medievalist, researchers Colin Layfield and Lisa Fagin Davis propose that the manuscript's bifolios were likely intended to be stacked as “singulions”—similar to a stack of postcards—rather than being bound in the “nested” arrangement commonly used in the 15th century.
Davis, executive director of the Medieval Academy of America, notes that any previous research based on the current sequence of pages will likely require revision. The manuscript, currently held at the Yale University Library, has remained an enigma to cryptographers and linguists since it was introduced to the rare book market by Wilfrid M. Voynich in 1912.
Entities
Colin Layfield · Lisa Fagin Davis · Medieval Academy of America · Voynich Manuscript · Yale University Library