Monitor this situation.
Unsubscribe anytime.
[SITUATION] · [QUIET] · [TECHNOLOGY]
14 clusters · 66 sources · 58 days · First seen · Last updated
Bitcoin split evolves as developers prepare BLAKE2b fork
Overview
Following the failure of the BIP-110 soft fork to restrict non-financial data, the main Bitcoin chain has seen a surge in data-heavy blocks. At block 962,266, standard monetary transfers were dwarfed by NFT inscriptions and custom scripts. While critics labeled this content “garbage and spam,” David Schwartz, CTO Emeritus of Ripple, argued that as long as users pay fees commensurate with resources consumed, the economic balance remains intact, warning that regulating block space could move decentralized structures toward traditional banking.
Concerns regarding replay attacks—where transactions from one chain are re-executed on the other—have intensified. Developers noted that a significant portion of blocks on the BIP-110 minority chain consist of replayed transactions from the main chain. In response, BIP-110 supporters are preparing to launch a separate proof-of-work chain, potentially around September 1. This new chain will replace the SHA-256d algorithm with BLAKE2b and introduce a new 164-byte block header to create a distinct design.
The move has ignited a governance debate. Schwartz characterized the creation of a separate chain after losing a consensus vote as an “attack on the network rather than a good-faith disagreement.” Conversely, supporters such as developer Loogart maintain they are simply accepting the governance outcome by voluntarily continuing their version of the protocol elsewhere.
Entities
Bitcoin · Luke Dashjr · Michael Saylor · Adam Back · Bitcoin
Claims
What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.
- [● 15 SOURCES] A minority Bitcoin chain emerged after nodes running BIP-110 rejected block 961,632.
- [● 13 SOURCES] BIP-110 aims to temporarily restrict certain forms of non-financial data embedded in Bitcoin transactions.
- [● 12 SOURCES] Miner signaling for BIP-110 was approximately 2.53% to 2.62% in the period preceding block 961,632.
- [● 12 SOURCES] BIP-110 requires a 55% miner signaling threshold for early activation.
- [● 8 SOURCES] The BIP-110 minority chain produced only two blocks before stalling.
- [● 7 SOURCES] Michael Saylor publicly opposed BIP-110, arguing that the protocol should remain neutral.
- [● 5 SOURCES] Michael Saylor described Bitcoin's consensus rules as a constitutional framework.
- [● 5 SOURCES] Saylor warned that internal changes to Bitcoin's consensus rules pose the greatest long‑term threat to the network.
- [● 5 SOURCES] Saylor predicts Bitcoin could grow 100‑fold and become core infrastructure for global capital markets.
- [● 5 SOURCES] Bitcoin’s block reward halves every 210,000 blocks, increasing reliance on transaction fees for network security.
- [● 5 SOURCES] Blockstream CEO Adam Back criticized BIP-110, stating it lacks technical and ecosystem consensus.
Timeline
-
16 days ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 2 sourcesBitcoin developers prepare BLAKE2b fork following BIP-110 disputeBitcoin developers are launching a new BLAKE2b proof-of-work chain following the BIP-110 proposal, sparking debate over whether the fork constitutes a network attack or legitimate governance.
-
27 days ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 2 sourcesBitcoin replay attack concerns grow amid BIP-110 hard fork discussionsBIP-110 supporters are discussing a hard fork to prevent replay attacks, where transactions on one blockchain are copied onto another, potentially impacting Bitcoin and its minority chain.
-
about 1 month ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 3 sourcesBitcoin sees increase in heavy data blocks after BIP-110 failureThe failure of the BIP-110 soft fork has led to an increase in data-heavy Bitcoin blocks filled with NFT inscriptions, sparking debate over blockchain neutrality and data limits.
-
about 1 month ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 18 sourcesBitcoin network splits as BIP-110 soft fork fails to gain miner supportA Bitcoin soft fork proposal (BIP-110) aimed at limiting non-financial data failed to gain miner support, resulting in a stalled minority chain that produced only two blocks before effectively freezing.
-
about 1 month ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 30 sourcesBitcoin undergoes BIP-110 chain split as minority fork stallsA Bitcoin chain split caused by the BIP-110 proposal has largely stalled after producing only two blocks due to minimal miner support (approx. 2.53%) and widespread community opposition.
-
about 1 month ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 2 sourcesBitcoin BIP-110 Upgrade Faces Low Miner Support and Contingency PlanBitcoin’s BIP‑110 soft‑fork, targeting data‑heavy transactions, has low miner support; developers prepared a fallback proof‑of‑work change in case the upgrade is blocked, raising governance and split‑chain risk
-
about 2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 9 sourcesMichael Saylor warns internal governance changes threaten BitcoinMichael Saylor says internal rule changes like BIP‑110 threaten Bitcoin, predicts 100× growth, and joins a $15 M security consortium with major firms.
-
about 2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 3 sourcesBitcoin faces debate over BIP-110 proposal to restrict on‑chain dataBitcoin's BIP-110, aimed at curbing arbitrary on‑chain data like Ordinals, faces minimal miner support and debate over potential chain split, with Blockstream's Adam Back downplaying risks.
-
about 2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 2 sourcesMichael Saylor condemns Bitcoin BIP 110 proposal as a fiat‑imposed monetary purity measureMichael Saylor denounces Bitcoin BIP 110 as a fiat‑driven attempt to enforce monetary purity, joining Blockstream CEO Adam Back in warning it would harm Bitcoin’s decentralisation and set risky precedents.
-
about 2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 2 sourcesBitcoin BIP‑110 Softfork Nears Activation as Miner Support Stalls Below 1%Bitcoin’s BIP‑110 softfork, aiming to limit data inscriptions for a year, will lock in around early September despite only 0.86% miner signaling, far below the 55% needed.
-
about 2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 19 sourcesMichael Saylor issues 110‑point critique of Bitcoin BIP‑110 proposalMichael Saylor published a 110‑point essay condemning Bitcoin BIP‑110, arguing it endangers network neutrality, lowers miner‑signalling thresholds and lacks support.
-
2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 3 sourcesBitcoin BIP 110 soft fork fails to attract miner supportBitcoin's BIP 110 soft fork, targeting data limits on the chain, has less than 1% miner support, far below the 55% needed, making activation unlikely.
-
2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 15 sourcesBitcoin proposal BIP‑110 faces sharp opposition from Michael Saylor and Adam BackBIP‑110, a temporary Bitcoin fork to curb Ordinals data, faces under‑1 % miner support; Michael Saylor and Adam Back oppose it, warning of dangerous precedents and potential network split.
-
2 months ago
[TECHNOLOGY] 3 sourcesBitcoin community sees BIP-110 soft‑fork collapse as bullish signalThe proposed BIP‑110 soft fork to limit data on Bitcoin failed, gaining under 1% mining support; founder David Bailey called the collapse a bullish sign for Bitcoin.
Sources
abmedia.io · academiadoencontro.com.br · activistpost.com · aic.gov.il · ambcrypto.com · analyticsinsight.net · assodigitale.it · bitcoin-2go.de · bitcoin.fr · bitcoinethereumnews.com · bitcoinmagazine.com · blockchainreporter.net · blockonomi.com · blocktempo.com · blockzeit.com · blogs.airdropalert.com · blogtienao.com · btc-echo.de · btcmanager.com · calaboucodamorticiablog.wordpress.com · coin-turk.com · coindoo.com · coinedition.com · coinotag.com · coinpedia.org · cointelegraph.com · cointribune.com · criptoinforme.com · criptotendencias.com · criptovaluta.it · crypto-news-flash.com · crypto-times.jp · crypto.news · cryptoast.fr · cryptobreaking.com · cryptobriefing.com · cryptonews.com.au · cryptonomist.ch · cryptopolitan.com · cryptoSlate.com · decrypt.co · doppiogusto.com · en.bitcoinsistemi.com · en.coin-turk.com · en.coinotag.com · fortunegreece.com · fr.benzinga.com · inversion.es
This summary has been updated 16 times: see revision history