[REVISION HISTORY]

Ghanaian mining rights revocation dispute

3 recorded revisions of this situation.

What changed

2026-10-29 19:16 UTC → 2026-10-30 13:35 UTC · added ~~removed~~

A dispute has emerged between Ghana’s Minerals Commission and local mining companies, including Northern Ashanti Mines Limited (NAML), Adamus Resources, and Narawa Mines, regarding the revocation of mining rights. The Minerals Commission maintains that the termination of leases and prospecting licenses, specifically NAML’s Konongo concession, was conducted in accordance with the Minerals and Mining Act, 2006. The Commission alleges that NAML failed to conduct meaningful mining operations for over two years and owes approximately US$8.33 million ~~to US$8.38 million~~ in outstanding Annual Mineral Right ~~fees.~~ fees, alongside nearly US$50,000 in prospecting licence arrears, with debt accumulating since 2010. NAML has rejected these allegations, describing the Commission’s claims as containing “falsehoods, untruths and half-truths.” The company ~~asserts it has invested between US$100 million and US$200 million in~~ disputes the ~~site~~ debt amount, arguing much of it is a legacy obligation from previous operators, and maintains it received no required notice of breach before the enforcement action. In response to the escalating conflict, NAML has initiated legal action against the Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, the Minerals Commission, and the Attorney-General. Minerals Commission CEO Isaac Tandoh has urged the firm to resolve the dispute through the judicial process rather than the media. Civil society groups, including IMANI Africa and the Ghana Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (GHEITI), have criticized the Commission’s actions. Vice President of IMANI Africa, Kofi Bentil, ~~suggested the seizure~~ has raised concerns regarding a perceived trend of politically connected individuals seizing Ghanaian-owned ~~mines may~~ mines, suggesting such regulatory actions could undermine national indigenisation efforts. Industry ~~experts, including a former Chief Inspector of Mines,~~ experts have previously urged the Commission to adopt a less confrontational ~~approach. They suggest~~ approach, such as negotiating payment plans rather than revoking licenses, arguing that current measures could discourage investment and conflict with policies aimed at increasing local participation in the industry. Recent developments confirm the Commission has revoked NAML’s mineral rights and prospecting licenses due to unpaid statutory fees. The Commission reports that NAML owed approximately US$8.33 million in Annual Mineral Right fees as of April 2025, plus nearly US$50,000 in prospecting licence arrears, with debt accumulating since 2010. The Commission noted that a previous proposal by BCM Investments plans, to ~~settle the debt in four instalments was not honored.~~ avoid discouraging investment.

Versions

Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.