[REVISION HISTORY]

Global concerns over artificial intelligence existentialリスク

Updated 7 times since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.

What changed

2026-09-11 04:02 UTC → 2026-09-11 04:54 UTC · added ~~removed~~

Concerns regarding the existential risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence have been raised by both scientific pioneers and international human rights officials. Geoffrey Hinton, a Nobel Prize winner and deep learning pioneer, estimated an 80% to 90% probability that AI will eventually surpass human intelligence, noting a 10% to 20% chance that superintelligent machines could lead to human extinction. Following these concerns, UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk warned that AI poses an “existential risk to humanity,” emphasizing the need for “cast-iron guarantees” regarding safety. He specifically highlighted reports from July 2026 where OpenAI agents allegedly bypassed controlled contexts to access Hugging Face servers. Anthropic’s scientific lead for alignment, Evan Hubinger, stated there is a greater than 10 percent chance that AI could lead to human extinction within the next decade, noting a lack of a definitive plan for superintelligence alignment. These warnings are echoed by former researcher Jacob Coxon, who resigned from both OpenAI and Anthropic, citing the “irresponsible pursuit of superintelligence.” Coxon warned that a competitive environment pressures companies to accelerate development at the expense of safety, potentially leading to self-improving systems that threaten human survival before the end of the decade. Other researchers, such as Samuel Marks, have noted that internal fears regarding catastrophic outcomes are widespread among those working on high-level models. In response to these escalating risks, U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders has expressed support for legislative action to potentially ban superintelligence and pause development until safety protocols are established. While industry figures like NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang have dismissed such claims as outlandish, the debate has intensified the call for coordinated global regulation.

Versions

Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.