[REVISION HISTORY]
Gulf states' joint stance on Gaza peace plan
Updated 2 times since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.
What changed
2026-08-07 18:05 UTC → 2026-08-16 17:57 UTC ·
added
removed
In early August 2026, foreign ministers from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia Arabia, and Egypt issued a joint declaration condemning Israel's ongoing military campaign in Gaza, saying it Gaza. The coalition stated that attacks on civilian infrastructure and health facilities breached international law and could derail threatened the implementation of U.S. President Donald Trump's Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict, which had been accepted by Palestinian factions. Later the same day On 6 August 2026, the coalition ministers released a second statement endorsing the Gaza peace plan, urging plan. They urged a reduction in violence, preservation of diplomatic mechanisms, phased Israeli troop withdrawal, progressive disarmament of Hamas, the establishment of a transitional Palestinian civil administration, and the deployment of an international stabilization force, force. Israel’s prime-ministerial office rejected the statements, accusing the coalition of distorting reality and blaming Hamas for continued humanitarian aid. On 6 violations, including re-arming. By 16 August 2026 2026, the eight nations issued a further joint statement condemning Israel's rejection of a roadmap designed to implement the Trump-backed plan. The ministers reiterated their condemnation, emphasizing noted that attacks on civilian infrastructure and health facilities violated international law and threatened the implementation of the Trump‑backed 20‑point framework. roadmap was supported by UN Security Council Resolution 2803. They called for expressed concern that Israel's refusal to follow the protection of civilians, unhindered humanitarian assistance roadmap and a return its rejection of Palestinian statehood undermines peace efforts, asserting that Israel bears responsibility for obstructing progress. The ministers called for continued U.S. engagement to a two‑state solution based on ensure Israeli compliance with the 1967 borders. Israel’s prime‑ministerial office responded by rejecting plan's arrangements, which include transferring administrative authority to the statement as a distortion of reality and blaming Hamas National Committee for continued violations. Gaza management.
Versions
- 2026-08-16 17:57 UTC Gulf states' joint stance on Gaza peace plan
- 2026-08-07 18:05 UTC Gulf states' joint stance on Gaza peace plan
- 2026-08-06 20:53 UTC Gulf states' joint stance on Gaza peace plan
Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.