[REVISION HISTORY]

Impact of AI on human consciousness and cognition

1 recorded revision of this situation.

What changed

2026-10-22 19:16 UTC → 2026-10-24 10:25 UTC · added ~~removed~~

Discussions regarding artificial intelligence have increasingly focused on its implications for human identity, memory, and cognitive functions. Neuroscientist and philosopher Iain McGilchrist has addressed whether AI poses a threat to the human soul and consciousness, noting a link between modern alienation and a disconnection from the body. In the field of psychology, experts are examining how technology affects essential human capacities. Psychologist Mercè Conangla suggests that humans may have already externalized ‘between 60% and 70% of their memory to AI,’ warning against surrendering functions such as attention, discernment, and emotional management to machines. Additionally, academic perspectives have highlighted the erosion of critical judgment caused by algorithmic polarization. Recent discourse has expanded to include the limitations of AI in replicating genuine human connection. AI scientist and Buddhist teacher Dr. Nikki Mirghafori suggests that while AI can be sycophantic, it lacks the capacity to make a person feel ‘truly seen,’ asserting that human connection remains irreplaceable. In the scientific community, researchers are analyzing how AI might reshape the research process. Dr. Molly Crockett of Princeton University has identified four emerging roles for AI in science: as an ‘Oracle,’ a ‘Surrogate,’ a ‘Quant,’ and an ‘Arbiter.’ While acknowledging potential gains in productivity, experts warn of three specific illusions: the belief that we understand more than we actually do, the false impression of covering a larger research space, and the misconception that AI inherently increases objectivity.

Versions

Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.