[REVISION HISTORY]

Impact of doomscrolling on mental health and news avoidance

Updated 1 time since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.

What changed

2026-08-17 15:48 UTC → 2026-08-20 05:43 UTC · added ~~removed~~

The phenomenon of ‘doomscrolling’—the continuous consumption of negative online news—is being identified as a significant risk to mental health. Experts attribute this behavior to a ‘negativity bias,’ an evolutionary mechanism that causes humans to prioritize potential threats over positive information. In Germany, data indicates that over 25 percent of adolescents engage in risky or pathological social media use, which can lead to stress, rumination, and sleep disturbances. In the United States, this behavior manifests across political and religious spectrums through an obsession with ‘doomsday scenarios.’ Recent data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2026 suggests that these patterns are contributing to a global rise in news avoidance. Approximately 42 percent of respondents worldwide report avoiding news, a significant increase from 29 percent in 2017. This shift is linked to information overload, constant notifications, and digital algorithms designed to maintain engagement through infinite content streams. A scientific review of 17 studies further clarifies that this habit is reinforced by specific platform design features, such as infinite scrolling and algorithmic recommendations. These elements remove the ‘natural stopping points’ found in traditional media. The research suggests that users often engage in doomscrolling while seeking clarity on concerning topics like wars or climate crises, but instead encounter a prolonged sequence of negative information.

Versions

Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.