[CLSTR]
< Back to situations

Monitor this situation.

[SITUATION] · [QUIET] · [POLITICS]

2 clusters · 5 sources · 11 days · First seen · Last updated

Indian judicial independence and propriety debates

Overview

In India, legal experts and retired judges have raised concerns regarding judicial propriety and institutional independence. Former Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and other retired judges criticized Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan for public comments concerning the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, suggesting such remarks are inappropriate while the matter is sub judice.

Additionally, former Supreme Court Justice Rohinton Nariman addressed the Collegium system for judicial appointments. While acknowledging criticisms of the current framework, Nariman warned that transferring appointment powers to the government could compromise judicial independence and noted a perceived decline in the strength of constitutional institutions, including the Election Commission of India.

Entities

UC Law San Francisco · Ujjal Bhuyan · Supreme Court of the United States · Trina Thompson · Election Commission of India

Timeline

  1. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    Judiciary experts analyze Supreme Court rulings and transparency

    Legal experts and federal judges are analyzing Supreme Court cases involving executive power, civil rights, and the impact of judicial secrecy on public trust in the United States.

  2. [POLITICS] 3 sources
    Indian judicial experts debate propriety and institutional independence

    Legal experts and former judges debate judicial propriety and institutional independence in India following controversial remarks by a Supreme Court judge and discussions on the Collegium system.

Sources

barandbench.com · sabrangindia.in · thecommunemag.com · thedispatch.com · uchastings.edu