< Back to situations

Monitor this situation.

[SITUATION] · [QUIET] · [CRIME]

2 clusters · 4 sources · 21 days · First seen · Last updated

Indian judicial rulings on bail and narcotics

Overview

Indian courts have issued various rulings regarding bail applications in cases involving fraud and narcotics.

In one instance, the Punjab and Haryana High Court denied anticipatory bail to an individual accused of immigration consultancy fraud, which Justice Sumeet Goel described as a “growing menace” linked to human trafficking. Conversely, a Delhi court granted anticipatory bail to a woman in a heroin supply case due to insufficient incriminating evidence.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court of India clarified its stance on narcotics-related bail, stating it maintains a “liberal approach” toward granting bail in cases involving ganja (marijuana) under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. This observation occurred during a review of a West Bengal man’s challenge to a Calcutta High Court order regarding a large seizure of contraband.

Entities

Biswanath Mandal · Calcutta High Court · Supreme Court of India · Justice Sumeet Goel · Punjab and Haryana High Court

Timeline

  1. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    Supreme Court of India adopts liberal approach to ganja bail cases

    The Supreme Court of India expressed a liberal stance on granting bail in marijuana cases while hearing an appeal from a West Bengal man accused in a large-scale ganja seizure.

  2. [CRIME] 2 sources
    Indian courts rule on immigration fraud and narcotics bail pleas

    Indian courts issued contrasting rulings: the Punjab and Haryana High Court denied bail in an immigration fraud case, while a Delhi court granted bail in a heroin supply case due to insufficient evidence.

Sources

kalingatv.com · liveLaw.in · thepatriot.in · timesnownews.com