[REVISION HISTORY]
US CLARITY Act stalls as crypto regulation shifts to agency
Updated 33 times since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.
What changed
2026-10-08 04:58 UTC → 2026-10-22 04:12 UTC ·
added
removed
The Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act remains stalled in the U.S. Senate following a failed cloture vote that on September 15, 2026, which saw 49 votes in favor and 50 against. While Despite efforts by Senate Republicans to release a revised 630-page draft incorporating over 100 changes to address Democratic concerns regarding ethics and “non-decentralized finance trading protocols,” the act intended bill failed to divide oversight between reach the SEC and CFTC, 60-vote threshold required to proceed. In response to the legislative deadlock has shifted deadlock, the regulatory focus has shifted toward agency rulemaking and separate legislative efforts, such as rulemaking. CFTC Chair Michael Selig indicated the House Ways and Means Committee advancing agency will utilize its existing authorities to establish a regulatory regime for digital assets, including potential oversight of unregistered exchanges. The CFTC has already begun submitting rulemaking packages to the White House. Meanwhile, the SEC continues to propose frameworks for treating digital asset taxation bill (H.R. 10357). offerings as investment contracts. Industry reactions to the stalemate remain divided. Bitwise suggested the market might benefit from While leaders like Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse have advocated for the absence act to ensure institutional adoption, others warn of the act, arguing the text had been weakened by concessions. However, BitGo CEO Mike Belshe warned consequences of delay. Senator Cynthia Lummis cautioned that if reform fails during the lack current Congress, the next opportunity may not arrive until 2030. Former Secretary of clear regulation could create systemic risks similar to Defense Mark Esper has also characterized the Lehman Brothers collapse if entities continue to serve act as a “one-stop shop” for exchange, brokerage, and custody functions. In a shift toward deregulation, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has withdrawn two major proposed rules. The first, from 2020, would have imposed strict reporting and identity verification on unhosted or self-custody wallets. The second, from 2023, targeted cryptocurrency mixing services. FinCEN stated these requirements could have created a “chilling effect” on legitimate activity. These moves align with the Trump administration’s goal “national security imperative” to ensure regulations are “fit-for-purpose.” Despite these shifts, legislative pressure continues. prevent rivals from setting global financial standards. House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill is advocating continues to push for the CLARITY Act’s passage during the upcoming lame duck session, arguing that current SEC and CFTC agency measures are insufficient compared to permanent legislation. Meanwhile, the CFTC is moving to establish its own framework to oversee crypto asset transactions, specifically focusing on retail operations and leveraged trading.
Versions
- 2026-10-22 04:12 UTC US CLARITY Act stalls as crypto regulation shifts to agency
- 2026-10-08 04:58 UTC US CLARITY Act stalls as crypto regulation shifts to agency
- 2026-10-05 17:59 UTC US CLARITY Act stalls as crypto regulation shifts to agency
- 2026-10-03 19:23 UTC US CLARITY Act fails Senate cloture vote
- 2026-09-28 02:53 UTC US CLARITY Act fails Senate cloture vote
- 2026-09-22 14:53 UTC US CLARITY Act fails Senate cloture vote
- 2026-09-14 07:04 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and declining passage
- 2026-09-10 06:55 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and declining passage
- 2026-09-07 10:52 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and declining passage
- 2026-08-31 07:34 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and declining passage
- 2026-08-28 08:45 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and declining passage
- 2026-08-25 02:39 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and regulatory shifts
- 2026-08-22 13:41 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and regulatory shifts
- 2026-08-21 14:46 UTC US CLARITY Act faces security warnings and regulatory shifts
- 2026-08-19 22:12 UTC US CLARITY Act advances toward September Senate vote
- 2026-08-18 12:56 UTC US CLARITY Act faces procedural hurdles and recess
- 2026-08-16 22:38 UTC US CLARITY Act faces procedural hurdles and recess
- 2026-08-16 01:36 UTC US CLARITY Act faces procedural hurdles and recess
- 2026-08-13 22:55 UTC US CLARITY Act faces procedural hurdles and recess
- 2026-08-12 13:16 UTC US CLARITY Act vote scheduled for September 15
- 2026-08-10 10:41 UTC US CLARITY Act vote scheduled for September 15
- 2026-08-09 04:39 UTC US CLARITY Act vote delayed to September
- 2026-08-08 11:26 UTC US CLARITY Act vote delayed to September
- 2026-08-07 19:26 UTC US CLARITY Act vote delayed to September
- 2026-08-07 19:26 UTC US CLARITY Act vote postponed to September
- 2026-08-06 16:17 UTC US CLARITY Act delay persists ahead of August recess
- 2026-08-05 02:48 UTC US CLARITY Act delay persists ahead of August recess
- 2026-08-03 18:30 UTC US CLARITY Act delay persists, race to August recess
- 2026-08-03 10:16 UTC US CLARITY Act delay persists, race to August deadline
- 2026-08-03 02:24 UTC US CLARITY Act delay persists, push for pre‑recess vote
- 2026-08-01 11:02 UTC US CLARITY Act delay persists, push for pre‑recess vote
- 2026-07-30 22:20 UTC US CLARITY Act delayed, outlook uncertain
- 2026-07-30 08:21 UTC US CLARITY Act delayed, support wanes
- 2026-07-29 17:20 UTC US CLARITY Act delayed, bipartisan support builds
Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.