[CLSTR]
< Back to situation

[REVISION HISTORY]

Justice Samuel Alito financial disclosures and recusal

Updated 3 times since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.

What changed

2026-09-28 23:53 UTC → 2026-09-28 23:56 UTC · added removed

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito released annual financial disclosures revealing international travel funded by nonprofit organizations and significant stock holdings in various energy and resource companies, such as ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66. These disclosures occurred as has recused himself from the Court prepared to hear upcoming case Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, a landmark case concerning County. The case, scheduled for oral arguments on October 5, examines whether federal law preempts state tort laws in lawsuits where local governments seek to hold energy companies liable for climate change damages. The plaintiffs in the case allege that Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil contributed to climate change and should be held responsible for resulting damages. Following pressure from environmental groups and watchdog organizations Alito’s decision follows scrutiny regarding his financial holdings, Alito announced his recusal from the case. A letter from Supreme Court clerk Scott Harris stated that Alito “has determined that he will not continue to participate in this case,” though no specific rationale was provided. While Alito owns stock holdings in several the oil and gas firms, industry. While he does not hold shares own stock in the two specific primary defendants, ExxonMobil or Suncor Energy. Watchdog groups, including Consumer Watchdog, noted that Alito’s Energy and ExxonMobil, his financial disclosures show investments in companies like other energy companies, including ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 represent potential conflicts, 66. Watchdog groups, such as those firms are defendants in similar climate-related litigation. Consumer Watchdog, had previously called for his recusal, arguing that his holdings could create a conflict of interest. The case is scheduled to be the first argued during the Supreme Court’s new term on October 5, and will be heard by the remaining eight justices. The ruling could set a major precedent have significant implications for dozens of other climate accountability similar climate-related lawsuits moving through state filed by various states and local courts. municipalities seeking billions of dollars in damages.

Versions

  1. 2026-09-28 23:56 UTC Justice Samuel Alito financial disclosures and recusal
  2. 2026-09-28 23:53 UTC Justice Samuel Alito financial disclosures and recusal
  3. 2026-09-28 21:31 UTC Justice Samuel Alito financial disclosures and recusal
  4. 2026-09-28 18:43 UTC Justice Samuel Alito financial disclosures and recusal

Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.