< Back to situations

Monitor this situation.

[SITUATION] · [ACTIVE] · [POLITICS]

7 clusters · 19 sources · 55 days · First seen · Last updated

US proposal to repeal Roadless Rule

Overview

The Trump administration has formally filed a proposed rule and draft environmental impact statement to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule. This action would potentially open approximately 45 million acres of public lands to road construction, logging, mining, and possible privatization. The rule currently protects about 59 million acres of public land, primarily in Alaska, the Western United States, New England, and Appalachia. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins stated the rescission is intended to “improve wildfire risk management and return control to local authorities.”

Opposition has intensified as the USDA moves forward. In Wyoming, the administration plans to open roughly 6.2 million acres to increased motorized access, including ATVs and e-bikes, a move USDA Undersecretary Mike Boren claims will remove “unnecessary barriers” to recreation. However, conservationists warn of “unsustainable outcomes” such as soil erosion and degraded water quality. Local governments remain divided; while Union County, Oregon, has called for the rule’s rescission to increase citizen access, Missoula County, Montana, maintains its opposition, citing the rule’s necessity for protecting watersheds and fisheries.

Public backlash has been massive. Following the close of the comment period on October 6, reports indicate over 1 million comments were submitted, with approximately 99% opposing the repeal. This follows a pattern of overwhelming dissent seen in previous years. Advocacy groups, including Outdoor Alliance, note that this substantial public record may form the basis for future legal challenges to protect the 80,000 river miles and drinking water for an estimated 25 million Americans currently safeguarded by the rule.

Entities

U.S. Forest Service · U.S. Department of Agriculture · Brooke Rollins · Forest Service · Trump administration

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Timeline

  1. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    US Forest Service faces massive opposition to Roadless Rule repeal

    Over 1 million public comments, mostly opposing the repeal, were submitted regarding a proposal to roll back the 2001 Roadless Rule protecting US national forest lands.

  2. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    U.S. administration proposes repeal of Roadless Area Conservation Rule

    The U.S. administration proposes repealing the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, affecting 44 million acres. While Wyoming wildlife officials support the move for local control, most public comments oppose.

  3. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    Public opposition reaches 99% against rescinding Roadless Rule

    Over 99% of public comments oppose the U.S. administration's plan to rescind the Roadless Rule, which protects 44.7 million acres of National Forest land.

  4. [POLITICS] 3 sources
    Trump administration proposes rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule

    The Trump administration proposed rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule, which could open 45 million acres of U.S. public lands to logging, mining, and road construction.

  5. [POLITICS] 4 sources
    US counties divided over proposal to rescind Roadless Rule

    Local officials in Oregon and Montana are divided over a proposal to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, which restricts road construction on certain national forest lands.

  6. [POLITICS] 3 sources
    Trump administration proposes repeal of U.S. Roadless Rule

    The Trump administration proposes repealing the 2001 Roadless Rule, potentially opening 45 million acres of national forest to logging and road construction, sparking concerns over water and wildlife.

  7. [POLITICS] 3 sources
    USDA proposes repealing Roadless Rule and expanding forest access

    The USDA is proposing to repeal the 2001 Roadless Rule and expand motorized access to millions of acres of U.S. national forests, sparking criticism from conservationists over environmental impacts.

Sources

americanrivers.org · azcapitoltimes.com · aztrail.org · capitalpress.com · deseret.com · elkhornmediagroup.com · keyt.com · kion546.com · krdo.com · lagrandeobserver.com · missoulacurrent.com · news.mongabay.com · oars.com · oilcity.news · oregonwild.org · thetrek.co · wallowa.com · wildernesswatch.org · wyofile.com

This summary has been updated 6 times: see revision history