[CLSTR]
< Back to situation

[REVISION HISTORY]

Vanguard vs Competitor ETF Comparisons – Expanded

Updated 3 times since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.

What changed

2026-07-28 22:46 UTC → 2026-08-14 00:04 UTC · added removed

The comparative analysis of Vanguard’s ETF lineup with rival providers continues to broaden. Existing data still show Vanguard’s expand, covering broad market, sector-specific, and international equity options. International and growth comparisons now include the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Developed Markets ETF (VWO) delivering (VEA), which features a 0.06% 0.03% expense ratio and a 2.40% dividend 2.6% yield, while State Street’s SPDR Portfolio alongside the iShares Core MSCI Global Stock Market Emerging Markets ETF (SPGM) (IEMG). In the U.S. growth sector, the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) targets mega-cap tech with a 0.07% expense ratio, while the iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) offers exposure to 929 small-cap stocks with a 0.09% ratio and 1.80% yield. Vanguard’s low‑cost 0.06% fee. Recent performance data highlights divergent trends. While the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) remains a benchmark, posting has maintained a 14.7% annualized return since its 2010 launch. In Australia, VAS tracks 2010, international funds like VTIAX have recently outperformed the S&P/ASX 300 with U.S. total market index (VTI) on a 0.07% fee year-to-date basis. Analysts suggest this shift may be driven by an overvalued U.S. dollar and modest 2% annual return, whereas VGS provides broader global exposure at 0.18% with a 10% recent return. New sector‑focused risks regarding high technology concentration in U.S. indices. This concentration is evident in the Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF (VGT), which holds substantial positions in NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. Sector-specific comparisons add depth. The Motley Fool guides contrast continue to highlight cost advantages. Vanguard’s Financials ETF (VFH) (0.09% expense, 8.7% 1‑yr return, 1.7% yield, $13.9 B AUM) with maintains a lower 0.09% expense ratio compared to State Street’s SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) (0.35% expense, 22.8% return, 2.1% yield, $1.6 B AUM). Top VFH holdings include JPMorgan Chase, Berkshire Hathaway and Mastercard. A second comparison pits at 0.35%. Similarly, Vanguard’s Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) (0.09% expense, 5.73% return, 2.13% yield, $9.2 B AUM) against offers a 0.09% expense ratio, significantly lower than First Trust’s Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) (0.60% expense, 3.23% return, 2.59% yield, $23 M AUM), highlighting VDC’s large‑cap staples exposure versus FTXG’s narrower, lower‑cost niche. Across all cases, investors are reminded to weigh expense ratios, dividend yields, fund size, sector focus at 0.60%. In Australia, the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS) and historical performance when selecting Vanguard, iShares or State Street products. the Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (VGS) remain key benchmarks for domestic and global exposure.

Versions

  1. 2026-08-14 00:04 UTC Vanguard vs Competitor ETF Comparisons – Expanded
  2. 2026-07-28 22:46 UTC Vanguard vs Competitor ETF Comparisons – Expanded
  3. 2026-07-27 09:16 UTC Vanguard vs Competitor ETF Comparisons
  4. 2026-07-25 23:35 UTC Vanguard vs Competitor ETF Comparisons

Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.