< Back to all clusters
[TECHNOLOGY] · Germany · 14 sources

started · updated

German Court Rules Against Suno in GEMA Copyright Lawsuit

The Munich Regional Court (Landgericht München I) ruled on 31 July 2026 that the U.S. AI‑music platform Suno infringed German copyright law by using works from the performing‑rights society GEMA to train its generative models without a licence. The judgment holds Suno liable for unauthorised copying of at least six well‑known songs – including “Atemlos”, “Mambo No. 5”, “Forever Young”, “Daddy Cool”, “Big in Japan” and “Rasputin” – and orders the company to disclose revenues linked to the infringement so damages can be calculated.

GEMA hailed the decision as a “important signal for strengthening the rights of creatives in the digital music market”, with CEO Tobias Holzmüller stating that AI models based on stolen works receive no legal protection. The ruling also obliges AI providers to obtain licences for both model training and the commercial use of generated music. Suno’s spokesperson rejected the court’s reasoning, saying the technology was mischaracterised and that the company is evaluating an appeal. Germany’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) welcomed the verdict, calling it a crucial step toward a fair digital market for creators.

The case marks one of the first major European judgments on AI‑driven music generation and is expected to shape licensing practices for AI developers across the continent.

Entities

GEMA · Kai Welp · Landgericht München I · SPD · Suno · Suno Inc. · Tobias Holzmüller · Wolfram Weimer

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.