< Back to all clusters
[POLITICS] · United States · 19 sources

started · updated

Judge James Wesley Hendrix declares key NFA provisions unconstitutional

U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the Northern District of Texas ruled that the registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short‑barreled rifles and short‑barreled shotguns under the 1934 National Firearms Act (NFA) are unconstitutional. The decision rests on Congress’s 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which eliminated the $200 tax that had justified the NFA’s regulatory scheme. Without the tax, the court found the law exceeded Congress’s taxing power and could not be upheld under the Commerce Clause. The ruling enjoined the ATF from enforcing the registration, fingerprinting and Form 1/Form 4 requirements for the affected firearms and placed a seven‑day hold for a possible appeal. Plaintiffs included Gun Owners of America, the Silencer Shop Foundation, the Second Amendment Foundation, and a coalition of 15 Republican‑led states. The injunction applies to the plaintiffs and their members, allowing owners to purchase suppressors, SBRs and SBSs without the former federal registration process, while other categories such as machine guns remain regulated. The decision is hailed as a major victory by gun‑rights groups and may prompt further challenges and possible Supreme Court review.

Entities

Department of Justice · Donald Trump · Gun Owners of America · James Wesley Hendrix · National Firearms Act · National Rifle Association · National Rifle Association – Institute for Legislative Action · One Big Beautiful Bill Act · Silencer Shop Foundation

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how well corroborated each claim is across sources.

Sources

7 days ago
7 days ago