Supreme Court rules on Jalisco laws regarding apology of crimes

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) has invalidated specific language in Jalisco's laws regarding the apology of “vices,” ruling that the term is too ambiguous to justify criminal penalties. The decision stems from Unconstitutionality Action 48/2026, filed by the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) against a decree approved by the Jalisco Congress in early 2026.

Following the ruling, the Government of Jalisco clarified that sanctions for the apology of crimes remain in effect. The state executive explained that while the Court struck down references to “vices” to prevent arbitrary decisions based on moral judgments, it did not strike down provisions that penalize the public incitement to commit crimes or the glorification of criminal conduct.

Consequently, the state maintains its ability to regulate and sanction content, including narcocorridos, provided the content meets the legal criteria for glorifying criminal acts. Additionally, local municipalities are still required to issue regulations to manage music and video content that promotes violence or exalts criminals during public spectacles.