started · updated
U.S. Supreme Court to review 1868 ban on home distilling
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutionality of an 1868 federal law that prohibits the distillation of spirits in private homes. The case, Department of Justice v. McNutt, arises from a legal dispute over whether Congress exceeded its taxation powers when it enacted the ban during the Reconstruction era.
Lower federal courts have reached conflicting conclusions on the matter. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the ban unconstitutional, stating it violates the taxation and necessary and proper clauses because it does not raise revenue and instead restricts activities that could be taxed. Conversely, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ban, viewing it as a necessary means to prevent tax evasion by making inspections more effective.
The federal government maintains that the prohibition is essential to prevent producers from concealing operations in dwellings to evade excise taxes. Violators of the current law face criminal penalties, including fines of up to $10,000 and up to five years in prison. Oral arguments are expected early next year, with a decision anticipated by late June 2027.
Entities
Department of Justice · Donald Trump · Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · Hobby Distillers Association · Scott McNutt · Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · U.S. Supreme Court
Claims
What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.
- [● 2 SOURCES] The Fifth Circuit ruled that the ban exceeds Congress's taxation power and violates the necessary and proper clause. www.scotusblog.com · nypost.com
- [● 11 SOURCES] The Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutionality of an 1868 federal law banning home distilleries. www.scotusblog.com · www.troyrecord.com · wtop.com · opslens.com · www.tag24.com · +6 more
- [● 11 SOURCES] Violating the home distilling ban can result in fines of up to $10,000 and up to five years in prison. www.scotusblog.com · www.troyrecord.com · wtop.com · opslens.com · www.tag24.com · +6 more
- [● 2 SOURCES] The Hobby Distillers Association filed a lawsuit in 2023 challenging the legality of the ban. www.scotusblog.com · www.joemygod.com
- [● 11 SOURCES] The federal government argues the ban is necessary to prevent the evasion of federal excise taxes. www.troyrecord.com · wtop.com · opslens.com · www.tag24.com · vinnews.com · +6 more
- [● 6 SOURCES] The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the federal ban in a separate case. www.troyrecord.com · wtop.com · vinnews.com · astig.ph · www.staradvertiser.com · +1 more