[CLSTR]
< Back to situation

[REVISION HISTORY]

Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody and financial dispute

Updated 13 times since CLSTR started tracking revisions of this situation.

What changed

2026-09-08 11:05 UTC → 2026-09-30 15:19 UTC · added removed

Following the failure of mediation in August 2026, the child custody The legal dispute between Ruben Onsu and Sarwendah Tan has proceeded expanded to the lawsuit reading stage at the South Jakarta District Court. include disagreements over educational management and property assets. In early September, Onsu’s legal counsel, Tiffany Setiawaty, stated Minola Sebayang, criticized Sarwendah’s role as primary custodian, suggesting that while she manages the focus children, Onsu remains on custody the party responsible for financing maintenance and education. In response, Sarwendah’s legal team, represented by Abraham Simon and Chris Sam Siwu, stated the fulfillment of previous agreements. conflict stemmed from Onsu’s team is demanding financial transparency, requesting detailed records of credit card usage and child support payments unilateral attempt to ensure funds are used for the children’s welfare. Setiawaty emphasized that Onsu is not avoiding his responsibilities and remains committed contact schools directly to maintenance inquire about fees and educational costs, provided there is physical evidence, such change registered payment accounts. They noted that administrative procedures must follow a Notarial Deed (Akta Notaris No. 39), which recognizes Sarwendah as receipts, to verify these expenses. Legal tensions the legal guardian and primary contact. By late September, the litigation escalated in early September as Sarwendah’s counsel, Jaenudin, alleged Sarwendah filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Onsu at the South Jakarta District Court (case number 1198/Pdt.G/2026/PN JKT.SEL). The suit alleges that Onsu has withheld child support failed to pay monthly installments for two houses, estimated at approximately eight months. The lawyer argued that withholding support due to visitation disputes is unjustifiable Rp300 million, since late 2025. These properties are currently held as collateral by PT Bank Central Asia (BCA), and suggested Onsu should have pursued a breach of contract claim instead. Concurrently, a social media video surfaced claiming to show Sarwendah taking money from Onsu’s safe, linked to allegations of losses totaling Rp3 billion. Sarwendah has denied the authenticity of missed payments risk the footage, asserting that assets being auctioned. The lawsuit includes PT Bank Central Asia as a party, with the video has been manipulated using AI. first court hearing scheduled for October 13, 2026.

Versions

  1. 2026-09-30 15:19 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody and financial dispute
  2. 2026-09-08 11:05 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody and financial dispute
  3. 2026-09-02 15:51 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  4. 2026-08-19 04:15 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  5. 2026-08-14 12:23 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  6. 2026-08-12 06:26 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  7. 2026-08-08 04:14 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  8. 2026-08-06 13:17 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  9. 2026-08-05 02:47 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute
  10. 2026-08-04 09:28 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody & asset dispute
  11. 2026-08-03 02:31 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody & asset dispute
  12. 2026-08-02 17:36 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody & asset dispute
  13. 2026-07-31 06:14 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute continues
  14. 2026-07-27 07:14 UTC Ruben Onsu & Sarwendah custody dispute continues

Only revisions since CLSTR began indexing content versions appear here. Select a version to see what changed compared to the one before it.