API
< Back to situations

Monitor this situation.

[SITUATION] · [ACTIVE] · [POLITICS]

4 clusters · 24 sources · 23 days · First seen · Last updated

Serbian judicial and prosecutorial disputes

Overview

In late October 2026, the Belgrade Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) announced 24-hour shifts to manage reports regarding electoral rights and public order. This followed a dispute with Appellate Court Judge Miodrag Majić, who alleged that ‘special duties’ were being organized for specific prosecutors. The VJT denied these claims, calling the judge’s comments “inappropriate and insulting.”

On October 27, Supreme Public Prosecutor Zagorka Dolovac established a special commission to inspect all 89 prosecutor's offices in Serbia. By October 28, a mandatory directive granted the five-member commission, headed by Goran Ilić, full access to all case files to verify legality and investigate whether prosecutors acted under political pressure. The oversight targets high-profile Belgrade cases, including the ‘Nadstrešnica’, ‘Zvučni top’, and ‘Senjak’ investigations. By October 31, the scope expanded to include police misconduct following the arrest of Marko Kričko, head of the Criminal Police Administration, and Boško Sekulović, head of the Service for Combating Crime. Commission member Branko Stamenković noted that the Belgrade Higher Public Prosecution initiated proceedings against these officials, a move that surprised the legal community.

On November 10, the Commission reported finding grounds to suspect Nenad Stefanovic, the Belgrade Higher Public Prosecutor, of abusing his authority. The Commission alleged Stefanovic established a “parallel prosecutorial system” that operated outside legal rules to pursue illegitimate objectives, citing selective application of law and unlawful searches. In response, Stefanovic filed criminal charges against Goran Ilić, alleging Ilić exceeded his authority and obstructed justice. The Commission's findings have been forwarded to the Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime.

Entities

Nenad Stefanović · Serbia · Goran Ilić · Zagorka Dolovac · Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade

Claims

What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.

Timeline

  1. [POLITICS] 5 sources
    Belgrade Chief Prosecutor suspected of abuse of power

    A commission suspects Belgrade Higher Public Prosecutor Nenad Stefanovic of abusing power and running a parallel prosecutorial system. Stefanovic has also filed charges against another prosecutor for misconduct

  2. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    Serbia Supreme Prosecution investigates police misconduct and student violence cases

    Serbia's Supreme Public Prosecution has formed a commission to monitor all national prosecutor's offices following the arrests of high-ranking police officials and ongoing concerns over police-prosecution legal

  3. [POLITICS] 21 sources
    Serbia Supreme Prosecutor orders oversight of all public prosecutor offices

    Serbia's Supreme Public Prosecutor has ordered a nationwide audit of all prosecutor offices to investigate potential human rights violations and ensure legal uniformity.

  4. [POLITICS] 2 sources
    Belgrade Prosecutor's Office announces increased election duties

    The Belgrade Higher Public Prosecutor's Office announced 24-hour shifts for the upcoming elections, denying claims by Judge Miodrag Majić regarding biased processing of election-related unrest.

Sources

24-ore.com · albeu.com · autonomija.info · beta.rs · danas.rs · europeanwesternbalkans.rs · insajder.net · kurir.rs · mondo.rs · n1info.rs · n24.ba · nova.rs · portalanalitika.me · sandzakdanas.rs · serbiantimes.info · sjevercg.me · szmsz.press · vecernji.ba · vecernji.hr · visualcrossing.com · vojvodjanskireporter.rs · vreme.com · zadarskilist.hr · zvornikdanas.com

This summary has been updated 5 times: see revision history