Monitor this situation.
Unsubscribe anytime.
[SITUATION] · [ACTIVE] · [BUSINESS]
8 clusters · 39 sources · 57 days · First seen · Last updated
UBS faces capital rules and scrutiny over Credit Suisse deal
Overview
The Swiss Council of States has approved stricter capital requirements for systemically important banks, specifically targeting UBS. In a vote of 33 to 10, the Council rejected a milder compromise and instead mandated that foreign subsidiaries be backed by 90 percent Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital. This decision serves as a middle ground between the government’s original 100 percent requirement and a parliamentary minority proposal of 50 percent supplemented by AT1 bonds. UBS has criticized the measure, stating it could cause long-term damage to global competitiveness. While earlier estimates placed the capital burden between $16 billion and $17 billion, more recent indications suggest the requirement could necessitate approximately $23 billion in additional CET1 capital. In response, UBS leadership is evaluating strategic options, including an international merger, splitting the conglomerate, or relocating its headquarters and stock listing to locations such as London or the United States. Potential interested parties for a merger include Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, and Standard Chartered. The Swiss Bankers Association has labeled the move an ‘extreme special path’ that deviates from international standards. The potential for relocation has raised domestic concerns; the Swiss Bank Employees Association warned that up to 12,000 Swiss jobs could be at risk if a relocation or sale occurs. This follows existing plans for 3,000 layoffs related to the Credit Suisse integration. Parallel scrutiny continues regarding the Credit Suisse acquisition. Investigations suggest the 16.5 billion Swiss franc write-down of AT1 bonds may have been a non-negotiable demand from UBS, despite Credit Suisse formally contesting the move before it was issued. Despite the regulatory tension, UBS is forecasting financial growth. Analysts project a 9.1 percent increase in net profit to $2.71 billion and a 24 percent rise in pre-tax profit to $3.52 billion, driven by Global Wealth Management fees and trading.
Entities
UBS · Sergio Ermotti · Switzerland · Karin Keller-Sutter · Colm Kelleher
Claims
What the coverage asserts, and how many sources carry each claim.
Coverage disagrees
Sources make claims that cannot both be true. CLSTR reports the disagreement; it does not decide who is right.
-
"UBS estimates it will need approximately $16 billion in additional CET1 capital due to the Council of States decision."
vs
"Goldman Sachs estimates the regulatory change could force UBS to raise roughly $17 billion in additional capital."
These claims provide different estimates for the additional capital required by UBS ($16 billion vs $17 billion).
- [DISPUTED] UBS estimates it will need approximately $16 billion in additional CET1 capital due to the Council of States decision.
- [DISPUTED] Goldman Sachs estimates the regulatory change could force UBS to raise roughly $17 billion in additional capital.
- [● 13 SOURCES] The Council of States approved changes to the Banking Act requiring UBS to back its foreign subsidiaries with 90 percent Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital.
- [● 8 SOURCES] UBS argues that the 90 percent CET1 requirement will damage its long-term competitiveness and business model.
- [● 4 SOURCES] The WAK-S proposed that UBS foreign subsidiaries be backed by 50 percent Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital and 50 percent AT1 bonds.
- [● 4 SOURCES] The Swiss Federal Council originally proposed that systemically important banks maintain 100 percent CET1 capital for foreign subsidiaries.
- [● 3 SOURCES] The Swiss Upper House voted to require UBS to back its foreign subsidiaries with 90 percent hard core capital (CET1).
- [● 2 SOURCES] The Federal Council's original proposal would have required UBS to hold approximately 20 to 23 billion Swiss francs in additional capital.
- [● 2 SOURCES] The Council of States passed the measure with 33 votes in favor, 10 against, and two abstentions.
- [● 2 SOURCES] UBS leadership is considering extreme options such as moving the group headquarters outside of Switzerland or splitting the conglomerate.
- [● 2 SOURCES] UBS leadership has reportedly revived discussions regarding a potential merger with a foreign bank to avoid Swiss regulations.
Timeline
-
[BUSINESS] 2 sourcesUBS forecasts profit growth amid Swiss capital regulation debate
UBS expects net profit to rise 9.1 percent to $2.71 billion while navigating political debates in Switzerland over stringent new equity capital requirements for foreign subsidiaries.
-
[BUSINESS] 7 sourcesUBS jobs at risk if strict capital rules force relocation
The Swiss Bank Employees Association warns that up to 12,000 UBS jobs could be lost if new capital regulations force the bank to relocate or restructure.
-
[BUSINESS] 6 sourcesUBS considers relocating domicile amid Swiss regulatory debates
UBS is weighing a change in domicile as Swiss lawmakers debate stricter capital requirements for offshore subsidiaries that could cost the bank $23 billion in additional equity.
-
[BUSINESS] 5 sourcesUBS faces regulatory pressure and potential headquarters relocation
UBS faces potential new liquidity backstop fees in Switzerland and is weighing the relocation of its headquarters to London or the US amid tightening domestic capital regulations.
-
[BUSINESS] 2 sourcesUBS faces strategic shifts and scrutiny over Credit Suisse acquisition
UBS faces strategic decisions regarding capital requirements and potential mergers, amid scrutiny over the 16.5 billion CHF AT1 bond write-down during its acquisition of Credit Suisse.
-
[BUSINESS] 9 sourcesUBS considers relocation or merger amid Swiss capital rule changes
UBS is considering a merger or relocation following Swiss parliamentary plans to increase its capital requirements by an estimated $16 billion, sparking concerns over global competitiveness.
-
[BUSINESS] 15 sourcesUBS faces stricter capital rules after Swiss Council of States vote
The Swiss Council of States approved a requirement for UBS to back foreign subsidiaries with 90% CET1 capital, a move the bank warns will cost billions and damage its global competitiveness.
-
[BUSINESS] 11 sourcesUBS capital rules: Swiss commission proposes moderate regulatory compromise
A Swiss parliamentary commission has proposed a moderate capital requirement for UBS foreign subsidiaries, opting for a 50/50 split of CET1 and AT1 bonds instead of the 100 percent CET1 demanded by the state.
Sources
ad-hoc-news.de · americanindependent.com · bahnhof.de · bilanzmedia.ch · bitcoinethereumnews.com · biznisinfo.mk · biznismagazin.rs · blick.ch · brisbanetimes.com.au · cash.ch · cnbce.com · cnn.gr · cryptobriefing.com · de.rt.com · diarioestrategia.cl · finanzen.ch · finanzen.net · finanznachrichten.de · finews.com · fool.com.au · insideparadeplatz.ch · it-boltwise.de · jornaleconomico.sapo.pt · latestnigeriannews.com · letemps.ch · m.smh.com.au · marketnews.gr · moneycab.com · n-tv.de · nacionalno.mk · newmoney.gr · noticiasdemalaga.es · radiolac.ch · tele1.com.tr · theage.com.au · toray.co.jp · watson.ch · woz.ch · zackbum.ch
This summary has been updated 11 times: see revision history