Criticism of international football scheduling

German football officials and club leaders have voiced significant criticism regarding international match scheduling and its impact on players and domestic leagues.

DFB Sporting Director Rudi Völler criticized the new FIFA international match calendar format, specifically an extended autumn break featuring four consecutive matches. Völler stated the structure is ‘not good’ and warned that the format increases injury risks, particularly for nations lacking squad depth. He suggested FIFA or UEFA reconsider the format by returning to previous systems or splitting matches into smaller blocks.

Following these concerns, FC Bayern München honorary president Uli Hoeneß described the UEFA Nations League scheduling as a ‘joke of the year’ and a ‘disaster.’ Hoeneß argued that international breaks occurring shortly after the Bundesliga season begins disrupt player rhythm. He specifically noted that 18 players were traveling for international duty only four weeks after the season started, leading to a loss of competitive rhythm. He emphasized that clubs, rather than national teams, are responsible for paying the players and should assert more control over schedules.

Hoeneß further characterized the Nations League as a ‘silly competition’ and noted that Bayern München is disproportionately affected by the high number of international players, including Harry Kane and Michael Olise. Bayern President Herbert Hainer added that the club is uniquely burdened by international commitments, noting the physical strain on players following heavy travel and match schedules.