Get alerts on this situation
We’ll email you as it develops, and you can follow the whole thread from day one.
Unsubscribe anytime.
[SITUATION] · [ACTIVE]
2 clusters · 2 sources · 28 days · First seen · Last updated
Categories: POLITICS
Nadiem Makarim judicial ethics controversy
Entities: Jakarta High Court · Purwanto S. Abdullah · Nadiem Makarim · Judicial Commission of Indonesia · GoTo
Overview
In early July 2026, former Indonesian education minister Nadiem Makarim lodged formal complaints with the Judicial Commission, accusing four judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court of breaching judicial ethics during his Chromebook procurement corruption trial.
By early August, Makarim’s legal team had moved to capitalize on those allegations, asking the appellate court to factor the potential misconduct into its review of his appeal scheduled for 5 August 2026. The lawyers also urged the Jakarta High Court to re‑examine the trial’s evidence and methodology, highlighting concerns about chief judge Purwanto S. Abdullah, who had previously faced sanctions for an ethics breach.
Timeline
-
2 days ago
[POLITICS] 2 sourcesNadiem Makarim's Lawyers Seek Judge Review Ahead of AppealNadiem Makarim's lawyers cite a Judicial Commission probe into judges' ethics and request the Jakarta High Court to re‑examine evidence and witnesses ahead of his 5 August appeal.
-
about 1 month ago
[POLITICS] 4 sourcesFormer Minister Nadiem Makarim Reports Four Jakarta Corruption Court Judges to Judicial CommissionNadiem Makarim’s legal team lodged a complaint with Indonesia’s Judicial Commission accusing four Jakarta corruption judges of ethical violations and fact manipulation in his trial, following his ten‑year graft
Sources
clovermedia.jp · itot.jp