< Back to situations

We’ll email you as it develops, and you can follow the whole thread from day one.

[SITUATION] · [ACTIVE]

2 clusters · 2 sources · 28 days · First seen · Last updated

Categories: POLITICS

Nadiem Makarim judicial ethics controversy

Entities: Jakarta High Court · Purwanto S. Abdullah · Nadiem Makarim · Judicial Commission of Indonesia · GoTo

Overview

In early July 2026, former Indonesian education minister Nadiem Makarim lodged formal complaints with the Judicial Commission, accusing four judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court of breaching judicial ethics during his Chromebook procurement corruption trial.

By early August, Makarim’s legal team had moved to capitalize on those allegations, asking the appellate court to factor the potential misconduct into its review of his appeal scheduled for 5 August 2026. The lawyers also urged the Jakarta High Court to re‑examine the trial’s evidence and methodology, highlighting concerns about chief judge Purwanto S. Abdullah, who had previously faced sanctions for an ethics breach.

Timeline

  1. 2 days ago

    [POLITICS] 2 sources
    Nadiem Makarim's Lawyers Seek Judge Review Ahead of Appeal

    Nadiem Makarim's lawyers cite a Judicial Commission probe into judges' ethics and request the Jakarta High Court to re‑examine evidence and witnesses ahead of his 5 August appeal.

  2. about 1 month ago

    [POLITICS] 4 sources
    Former Minister Nadiem Makarim Reports Four Jakarta Corruption Court Judges to Judicial Commission

    Nadiem Makarim’s legal team lodged a complaint with Indonesia’s Judicial Commission accusing four Jakarta corruption judges of ethical violations and fact manipulation in his trial, following his ten‑year graft

Sources

clovermedia.jp · itot.jp